H 265 vs h264 reddit

H 265 vs h264 reddit. You are always incurring additional loss. 264 can actually edge out in quality over h. Neither will work well as H264 and H265 are codecs that are designed for video playback at a low file size. 264 or h. On the H. Small terminology note, H. The encoder makes a significant difference in high speed game footage. I. Most of the special compression techniques that make it better than H. 265 are specifications. In an ideal world the video quality would be the same as my original footage, and the file size for 109 minutes would be around 77GB (I have three similar length videos, and I'd A community-run subreddit for Adobe video editing apps including Premiere Pro, Premiere Rush, Premiere Elements, and Media Encoder. Currently H. 265 wins over the H. So you could potentially get a better looking h. Most Blu-rays are also natively in H. 265). It would be like re-encoding all of your h. 264 file will never look as good as the h. 264 for playback on my laptop which I guess explains the increased CPU usage. Just make sure you dial in the bit rate or you might not actually be getting any benefits for storage size. So if the frame rate, resolution, and bitrate are the same between the two options, h. It isn't apples to apples. I then averaged out each recording to Kbps and averaged those. 265 acceleration. 265 are hardware-accelerated on modern hardware. 265 is mainly used for TV and high quality streaming distribution. 265 is a successor of H. The same for h. 265 100M = 14dB So even when h. . 265 are aweful, except x265! H. Vvc vs av1 is Google open source vs paid mpeg proprietary codec vvc (h266). Like I said, this is interesting data, doesn't 100% line up with what I've seen, but I'm not trying to encode a library of files that may have already been compressed. 265 than h. That was the case for all bandwidths i tested so 50/25/20/10/5. 265 encoding? I gave H. File sizes will be smaller, and you can get better quality using the same (or even a little less) bitrate. 265 use bother intraframe and interfaces compression. On a side note if you want H264 from a native BI H265 . h. 265 and the file gets corrupted easily. In this case the processor could easily read the h. My understanding of h265 is it does use less bandwidth than h264 but the algorithm is much more complex. FOUR times the pixels and better audio, but less than 1GB bigger. 264 from a software encoder at less than double the bitrate vs a hardware encoded h. Scenes without much motion can be compressed more efficiently than high motion scenes. In short, your h. 265 is more efficient in terms of compression, offering better video quality at lower bitrates compared to H. 265 and has better compression and quality than H. 264 on that camera was 786KBps and H. 265 files can be 25-50% less bitrate than H. 265, and AV1 video encoding capabilities in speed, file size, and quality to see which encoders can properly save the most space for their speeds. While many new devices support H. Support, tips & tricks, discussions, and critique requests are welcome! Even though Premiere is fully able to handle H. 265 file and streaming will be easy to achieve given the small size of the movie. Interframe vs Infraframe codecs: “There are intraframe and interframe codecs. 264 of RF 20 and Very Slow takes about 15 minutes per 20-minute video and H. A codec (H. 265 no problem. 9GB. Slower encode = smaller file, and I went fairly slow to get good compression and smaller filesizes. Your image you are using for your presentation should be fine. 264 at high resolutions. 265 included TrueHD passthru which is huge in size. Probably the processor is too slow and overheats as well, causing the One R to freeze. 265 is giving you the shooting specs you want, then shoot in that. As for x264 vs x265, these are software projects that are fairly widely used in programs like FFmpeg or HandBrake. This is particularly beneficial for streaming high-resolution content and 4K video. This was brought up on another thread, but I have one video I encoded at both 1080p with h. 264 (early Blu-ray Discs may be encoded in MPEG-2 or VC-1, while new UHD discs are encoded in H. 265 is HEVC, so ideally avoid mixing terminology by saying "H. Nov 17, 2021 · The H. The tradeoff factors are QUALITY vs ENCODE SPEED vs FILE SIZE with the caveat that you can only prioritize two factors. 2048 kbps might be enough for a low-motion scene, but a high-motion scene might be bitrate-starved. All implementations of H. 264 They’re intraframe codecs designed for efficient editing, unlike H. It's particularly noticable in my anime collection, as I'm making a point of getting dual-audio h265 content where possible, and I've got various version labelled with x265, h265 and HEVC. x265 is a head and neck better than x264 in terms of quality and compression Just like Intel QuickSync. 265 video files don’t take up as much storage space, and they require less bandwidth to stream. If In any case, I'm now looking to re-encode from the MKV rips to H. You can remux the video from a blu-ray for a 1:1 "lossless" rip (lossless from the disk, not that the codec used is lossless necessarily). 264 or H. Additionally, H. 264 - and you can't even do 2-pass VBR h. The 1080p version takes 4. I have a brand new formatted Sandisk Extreme Pro and I used H. 264 encoded movie is direct streaming to my laptop and the H. 264 is universal format supported by every modern headset. Movie (1080p, H. 264 encodes by my own subjective judgement. 264 encodes outperform poorly done 4GB/ep h. 264 (RF22) and the same video 4k with h. 265, then take that h. In addition to what shmushkan said, note that only the latest GPUs have full hardware acceleration for H. VC-1 QP was the more traditional one, and the actual value used to quantize. 265 1080p to be on par with H. The problem is a lot of release groups seem to microsize it. I lined up the times to be similar and the recording lengths to be similar. 264? What it'll end up coming down to is turn-around time. But what's the golden zone for both types? 10 Mbps for a 1080p H. e. The choice between them should be based on h. Davinci Resolve and AVID are notorious for bad h264 mp4's where I always had to export prores/DNxHD/HR to Handbrake while Premiere and Final Cut has less issues with h264's. I mainly use Android TV, Android tablets and Android phones and XBox One all support H. 265 a go, but since it seems to take around 1 day for a 2 hour video on a Ryzen 2700X it seems like the amount of electricity used in a day costs more than additional disk space. 265 difference is of the streaming bandwidth of the upload speed being of abt 40-50% with simillar quality in which H. 265 for some reason beyond my understanding also introduced colour artifacting even though the source was exclusively black and white. 264 has a more varied spectrum of implementations because it is the most used video codec worldwide, thanks to YouTube. If you really want to split hairs, h. This means that either you can have a video of identical quality for half of the size of an equivalent H. File size is a good benchmark but not a golden rule. 264 vs H. 264 the GPU overload went away. 265 is higher quality and smaller file sizes than H. But Sonarr recognises all these, and I'm not really sure why. 264, so if you're storing footage H. 264 because of the smoother performance but if you really hate the compression artifacts you could try HEVC instead. Second, RF20 265 is not the same thing as RF20 264. For example, QP 20 looked pretty good in H. 265, you have now run the video through two lossy encode passes. 265 would produce a smaller file. 265, but the different behavior of H. 265 was designed to be twice as efficient as H. 265 recordings were from another day. There is an image 4K h. 264 and h. 264 and be the same or better quality. 265 was 2 generations prior to that at the 10XX series. Intraframe means that the compression is done within the frame itself. 264 and in most cases better quality. 265 did a considerably worse job encoding the noise. 265" or "AVC vs. 264 is supported by literally every single device that can play media. It has mainly a better compression and a higher maximum frame size. 264, because I upload them to YouTube. Records cars as they pull up and pull through. 264 version of the same movie, CPU usage runs in the 5%-10% range. It’s just dumb. If you choose ENCODE SPEED and FILE SIZE (particularly aiming for the same output size), then your QUALITY will be unpredictable due to varying content. I don't plan to do any massive color grading for the documentary stuff, so 420 vs. 265: Compression Efficiency: H. 264 footage. Most people seem to prefer h. 264) - 7Gb Movie (1080p, H. Most of our files come off the GoPro in H. Even with the license fees is widely supported for quite a few years now. 264 is 10-bit 422 in All-I. 265's greater efficiency, you really need to be doing a 2-pass VBR software encode, and that takes an order of magnitude longer than the same in h. 265: Becoming more popular for streaming, especially in situations where bandwidth is a concern, as it allows for better video quality at lower bitrates. 264? If yes, is there a way to reduce the loss of quality within Premiere? Thanks for your help There’s a big “it depends” factor, but you get something close to 30-50% better compression in h. 265 is max supported by Oculus Go/Quest 1 and a number phones running Snapdragon 845 (Galaxy S9) and below. So if h. As for containers, MP4 is the most common one. 264 file and encode from that to h. 264 recordings were from a single day and all the H. AVC is another name for H. But I worry a bit about LongGOP vs. GPU's in the 5000 series ans newer from AMD support hardware H265 (source I have 5700 xt) and 3000 series and newer from nvidia should be fine. If you download the large image and zoom into the samples, h265 basically completely blurs together the detail in the pavers, whereas h264 is not much different than original. It also takes up less space on my hard drives. H. 264 is commonly used for standard definition and HD content, while H. The h. 264: More widely supported by older hardware and devices. 265: Which codec is better? In a nutshell, the H. Also, the reason why the AMF quality is so poor is due to the lack of optimization for H264. First, RF20 Slow is not the same as RF20 Slower. 264/H. 265 (RF24). 264, with a fast connection it’s unneeded to stress the CPU more. Another video I Full comparison between H. You want software, if you're not using it to record your screen gor streaming, or something of the like. However, H264 is capable of doing higher bitrates than H265 (H264 can go up to ~960mbps but H265 struggles past ~200mbps) If you have a very good network setup you'd best off using H264 at a higher bitrate (400 or above), but most people will be better off using H265 since their network won't be able to handle higher H264 bitrates. 265 is its successor. 265, not on the features of x264 vs x265. 264 to h. Without hardware support it's not going to see much adoption. Insta360 Studio has a couple options for h. It essentially does the same job but the creators of H. That’s typically what I stream. Banding issue with H. I don’t understand why they would allow you to re-encode an h. 264 and is designed for high-resolution videos. The H264 will look a lot better and encode a lot faster in handbrake. 265 can achieve the same video quality as If you want to make the most of h. Reply reply I've seen 1GB/ep h. 265 was at 750KBps. A straight transcode of ProRes video to h. 265. 265 file that has been encoded from your h. HEVC (H. Comes at lower filesize compared to h. It's mostly cardboard format which come at high filesize. All other things being equal, it totally is. However, if you want more versatility and fewer playback issues, H. If you plan on compressing, H. Beyond a certain bit rate, other settings are going to effect the quality more. 264 or 5 video to a higher bitrate than it was originally recorded. If I took 2 streams of 265 vs 264 side by side at the same bitrate the 265 looked often better, but not really noticably in my opinion. 264, just as HEVC is another name for H. Hence, my question: is there a significant loss in quality, if I convert the HEVC file into H. 264 are more effective the higher you go in terms of resolution, and less effective the lower you go. 265 does use more processing power (so your friend is wrong about it being faster), however, both H. 265 claim that it is twice as efficient. 265 codecs are 10-bit 420 in LongGOP, whereas the H. H265 is not that efficient. With H. As indicated in the images below, the H. Two different encodes of the exact same episode with the exact same file size could have very different qualities. 265 (HEVC) looks a little nicer (less blockiness in dark areas) but also causes stutter on some systems. Oct 11, 2022 · A friend was telling me he thought H. I know that the codec is newer and theoretically gives same performance with smaller filesizes, but in the GH6 the H. So Nvenc vs AMF for streaming => AMF looks like crap with low bitrate -> go with nvenc Nvenc vs AMF for recording / encoding in premiere, davinci => AMF looks like Nvenc with the same cqp but will need a higher bitrate. They are not codecs. 264, let's say the file is 1 gb, AV1 output is like 100 mb, and H. 265 and h. 264 is AVC and H. 265 video? Is the bit rate for either the source footage and the encoded footage constant or variable? Your h. When moving the same was true most of the time but again I could not see big differences, and even with nvidia Hardware on both sides I still cant´t. Bitrate and File Size: H. 264 on the other hand is more widespread and is one of the standard codecs for video content on the Internet. 265 file and convert to h. Just like h264 vs vp8 and h265 (hevc) vs vp9. 264, etc which are highly compressed interframe delivery codecs that require intensive decoding of information across groups of frames to be able to playback. 265 than it would H. 265 10-Bit on RF 20 and Slower takes about an hour and a half for a 20-minute video. 265 in Premiere (yet) so that would involve exporting to ProRes first and running it through a 3rd party encoding package H. 264 did not do that, but that could be a quirk of the codec rather H. 265 is confounding my efforts. I also noticed in games that I would get microstutters, that stutters also went away. 264 vs. 265 is faster and less CPU. 265 delivery you need or want. All the H. having a FullHD 2 hours movie sized to under 2 gigabytes. 264 yourself and make sure it’s up to your standards. Eventually you might want to look at AV1 though for the future since it has no patent issues like H. 264 Nvidia bad. 264, resulting in files of comparable video quality that are about half the size. 8GB. The 4k version takes 5. 265 is 300 mb. 265 vs H. 4K h. 265) - 10Gb Here are my 2 questions: The second format is the best choice given the file size. 265 does provide the smallest file sizes. For 4k60, I'd go with 60 mbit h265 over 100 mbit h264. blu ray discs already come in h264 some also use VC-1. 264, If you encode from High Quality Source to h. 265 at equivalent bitrates (so a much larger h. 265 export, one of which is “extreme“. But if you got the power and the time to make it happen, then it might be worth flying with H. Make sure you use the NVenc encoder if you have a recent Nvidia GPU. 265+ also offers better memory efficiency, allowing devices to process more data with less RAM usage. Each of them have their advantages and disadvantages, and it depends on your video needs as to what you decide to choose. ) or because those clients are incapable of playing the codec natively. Or 2) Render as DNxHR HQ, and then use handbrake/ffmpeg to make the H. Use ProRes, DNXHR, GoProCineform for editing. It'll take you longer to make proxies out of H. All other setting being equal, I was under the impression that H. 264 (I think, I found it tricky to find a quick and simple explanation of that) so you might as well kick out the h. x264 is the best implementation. 265 codecs are different in terms of video compression efficiency. 265 files, I eventually must export my edited videos in H. Members Online. 265 version of the movie is being transcoded to H. The x265 project is based on the x264 code so they're very similar to one another, though obviously they implement different encoding. 265) and a container (MP4, MKV) are two different things. bvr file, I would recommend export in BI with no re-encoding then use handbrake to convert the H265 file to H264. 264 and HEVC, the QP value is really a logarithmic progression that maps to the "real" QP that's used to quantize; each 6 steps doubles the quantization. 265 will “look better”. 265 codec compresses information more efficiently than H. The computer is a Core i9 12900H and has a GTX 3070 TI. YouTube will take your h. 265) is more CPU intensive, making it less data to be transmitted, more suitable for weaker connections. For 1080p30 I'd pick 50 mbit MPEG2, 35 mbit h264 or 20 mbit h265. 264 movies in Handbrake at the highest setting. 265, or at least doing a few projects with it to see how it goes. HEVC". 264 vs h. 264 movie? And would it be like 5 Mbps for H. Intel 6th generation onwards have H. In H. nVidia before 9th gen has none, 9th & 10th gen only do 4:2:0 and only the 16/20/30 series Was wondering if anyone has done any testing or recommendations on editing files that have been taken in H. Hardware Requirements: H. It will probably be a different story in a few years, though legacy devices will be around for a long time regardless so at best services may have to support both (and some like twitch may never fully swap because Do you use H. Now, I know these are all the same codec. I know that generally H. 264 filesize) but how much of a deal that is depends on the nature of the actual content you're encoding. 264. From there, use your ProRes 422 master to encode to whatever h. The benefits of this are twofold: H. 265 for video playing via HDMI After Effects help and inspiration the Reddit way. 265? What's the bitrate of the encoded h. 265 might make sense and you won't loose any quality from your original H. 265+ provide higher levels of compression, enabling more efficient delivery of UHD content. 265 4K content is being transcoded, likely because of incorrect settings on your clients (direct play / direct stream disabled, forcing a lower resolution, etc. 265 decode. 265 is a useless setting because it crashes and you need to remove the battery to get the Insta 360 One R to function again. For comparison vvc is 10 times more computational more intensive than hevc on encode and two times on decode. Here are some key differences between H. What encoder to do use to change the footage from h. 422 is probably a non-issue. 264 IP cameras for the compresson encoding. 265) - 3Gb Movie (4k, H. Primarily i think the important thing is that so long as t there it shows H. 265 (HVEC) is more efficient but also a bit more involved, not every player can decode it and/or might buffer on low end hardware. 264, H. 264 is the current standard for many types of video. What I've seen is that with original source footage if I choose H. 264 had the same bitrate, h. 264 is better in that department. 264, but awful in VC-1. 265 is no worse than real time, probably faster. 265 is a better encoder than H. 265 Nvidia, my encodes take about 1/3 the time as h. After some tinkering, I realized that if I kept all things the same but changed my encoder from NVENC HEVC (which I have been using from the beginning) to NVENC H. A high quality one that doesn’t lose visual fidelity from that encoding. 264 and H. 265 and we have always had issues with Crashing and Freezing. 265, and do full-resolution renders from H. 265 (but some people say it's only worth doing that it your source footage is RAW or 10bit). So that means instead of a 10gb you could also have a 6gb file with around same quality. 265 and H. They simply didn't mean the same things. The efficiency is around 40-60% in regards to h264. 265: Requires more modern hardware for efficient decoding. I just realized compressing the large collage in PNG muted the differences a little. 264, you could set the RF slider to a good quality setting, and then adjust the encoder speed slider. 265 50M = 12dB h. 264 video or a video of the same size with much higher quality. With a fast connection, or with a lower end CPU, choose H. 265, some They've both the nextgen codecs. uqq hibxbq ckk inv dibxr dpalj gmvyv mhqhqcs gbsbhhjfk lbdhpz